ARCHIVED 5.2.3. Technical versus Terminology Standards

 

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Consult the Pavel in ...

Related Links

Español Português Italiano Nederlands العربية

Previous page Next page

In the field of terminology, there are two different types of standards: technical standards, also known as specification standards, and terminology standards.

Technical Standards

Technical standards in terminology are like any other technical standard. They lay down the characteristics or commonly agreed-upon specifications of a terminological product, service, process or system.

Terminology Standards

Terminology standards, on the other hand, are like measurement standards in that they are considered fundamental standards. They specify the commonly agreed-upon vocabulary to be used in a standard or family of standards. Terminology standards, instead of giving the specifications for a product, service or process, specify the preferred terms along with the definitions (specifications of the term) to be used to ensure a common understanding of the key concepts in a given standard.

Terminology standards may stand on their own and take the form of a separate standard containing all the terms and definitions used in a family of related standards or they may be linked to a specific standard and be incorporated in a section within a technical standard.

Terminology standards are generally de jure standards, that is standards produced by a standardization or official body. They are the product of an open, well-organized standardization process based on formal production rules. They are equally accessible to all. De facto standards are those established by market share. Once a technology becomes dominant, it and its terminology become the de facto standard. For example, Microsoft Windows™ and its accompanying terminology are de facto standards.